Hiring experience grader
How healthy is your hiring experience?
Candidates judge you before they apply: in Google, in an AI assistant’s answer, on the phone in their hand. Put in your careers site and see what they see, scored out of 100, with what to fix first.
Hiring experience score
We couldn’t get in
Or let our grader in: ask your web team to allow visits that identify as inploi-grader, then .
–
Not graded yet
Fix this first
In your full report
Read from your site as it is served, tried on a phone, set beside your main site, and your answers. A grade is kept for a day so a second look is instant. How we score.
Full report
Every fix, in order
Free for your work email. What to change first, why it matters to candidates, and who can help.
Your report fills in here once you grade a site or answer the questions above.
Method
How we score
Six areas, each scored out of 100. The headline is the average of the areas we could score.
- Is it discoverable?
- Your careers page, a job page, robots.txt and your sitemap, read as served.
- Is it AI ready?
- robots.txt, llms.txt and your pages, read without running JavaScript, as most AI crawlers read them, then compared with the page once its script has run.
- Is it fast and mobile?
- Your careers page, loaded on an emulated mid-range Android phone over 4G in Cloudflare Browser Run, measured with the browser’s own timings. A lab run, so real visitors will differ a little either way.
- Does it convert?
- Your answers, and the job page on the phone: where its Apply link goes, where it sits, and whether it states pay.
- Is it open to everyone?
- axe-core, the open-source accessibility engine, run against WCAG 2.2 A and AA on your careers and job pages once they have loaded on the phone.
- Does it feel like your brand?
- Your main site, found from your careers site and loaded on the same phone. Speed, type and links are measured; the look and voice are judged by an AI model (Workers AI) shown both first screens side by side.
Each check passes, needs work (a third of the marks) or fails, and an area is the weighted average of its checks. Core Web Vitals use Google’s published thresholds: content within 2.5 seconds, a response to a tap within 200 milliseconds, and layout shift under 0.1. A job page needs 150 words in its own code to count as readable.
80 and over is healthy, 50 to 79 needs work, and under 50 is lagging. Fixes are ranked by how much each would lift your headline score on its own.
What this does not check
We read one careers page and one job page, not your whole site, and your main site’s home page. We don’t fill in your application form, so how long it takes and what it asks come from your answers. Google decides what its job search shows; we check the data it needs. Automated accessibility tests find many barriers, not all of them. A site behind strict bot protection may turn our grader away; we say so when it does.
Your site is read and loaded by inploi’s grader on Cloudflare (Browser Run and Workers AI), which identifies itself as inploi-grader. Accessibility is tested with axe-core. Google for Jobs follows Google’s job posting guidelines. A grade is kept for a day so a second look is instant; your answers stay in this page’s address until you ask for the report. See our Privacy Policy.