“inploi helped us reset. They gave us the tools and insights we needed to make smarter decisions, build trust internally, and deliver a candidate experience we could be proud of.”
ROI gap
We can't connect spend to hires.
The ATS tells you who applied. It does not tell you why, or from where, or what it cost. So the budget is defended by habit at every renewal, and the channel that quietly delivers the hires gets the same as the one that delivers clicks.
StudioInsightsSource attributionJobAllLocationAllBrandDate range
ApplicationsourcechannelcampaignReached
Team leaderLondonGoogleSearchTeam leader · Londonhire
ChefManchesterIndeedSearchChef · Manchesterapplication
Kitchen porterManchesterAdzunaSearchKitchen porter · Manchesterapplication
Customer assistantBristolCareers siteReferralCustomer assistant · Bristolfirst click
Returned to Your ATSTeam leader · London · Google · Search
How inploi solves it
Prove hiring ROI
inploi sits between the candidate and your ATS, so it sees who arrived, from where, and what happened next. Job distribution puts every role in front of the right people at a cost you can see, paid on applications rather than clicks.
Analytics and attribution
Source to hire. Every applicant and every hire attributed.
StudioInsightsSource attributionCost per hireIllustrative data
Before the renewalReferral · Lowest cost per hire
Illustrative data · not measured results
Job distribution
Every role in front of the right people, attributed to source.
Works alongsideCareers sitesHiring AgentIntegrationsStudio
Proof
71%
78%
63%
£4.89
27%
“They are reaching talent pools we couldn't reach on our own.”
The problem · ROI gap
We can't connect spend to hires, so we keep paying for channels that don't deliver and can't prove what does.
50%
of spend lost to drop-off
Source: inploi platform data from 100M+ candidate interactions.
The alternative
Job board spend with no attribution.
Credits bought in bulk, roles posted by hand, and a renewal conversation built on what the board says it delivered. Nobody can say which channel brought the hires, so nothing gets cut and nothing gets moved. Attribution puts a candidate against every pound and a source against every hire, and the number is there before the renewal is.
FAQ
Yes. inploi tracks every candidate from first click through to application, showing which source, campaign, or channel brought them. This data is visible in Studio and can be segmented by job, location, brand, or date range. Attribution data is sent back to your ATS where technically possible.
The business case draws on three numbers: job board and agency spend, time to hire, and application quality and conversion. We model it on your own data, or on industry benchmarks where you do not track a number yet.
It places every role on them from one connection, adds paid reach where a role needs it, and attributes every application back to the board or channel that brought it. What changes is that you can see what each one returned.
Agents do the admin. Humans do the hiring.
See what inploi would take off your team.
The hiring experience audit takes four minutes.